Kinematic test and measuring equipment manufacturing · Minnesota

Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie

Minneapolis, MN · ~51 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Kinematic test and measuring equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Kinematic test and measuring equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie safety composite

Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie held a steady TCR band

Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334519 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/5
  • PHOTO Digital Solutions : …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Digital Solutions : MC - North America Distributed (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Kinematic test and measuring equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie falls in its industry

128 Kinematic test and measuring e establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 5 Kinematic test and measuring e employers in Minnesota.

Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie (51 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie
Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie (51 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Bruker Nano Surfaces - Eden Prairie has fewer employees than the Kinematic test and measuring equipment m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334519 · MN · Minneapolis

128 Kinematic test and measuring equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Digital Solutions : MC - North America Distributed 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mirion Technologies (Canberra), Inc. 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint-Gobain Crystals- Hiram 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sun Nuclear - Florida 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Union Dairy LLP 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE ON 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wes Hanson Builders 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis Office 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Precision Strip, Inc. Bowling Green 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ox Industries Illinois, LLC 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Bay West 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Producers Livestock Marketing Association - Salina Branch 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.