Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors · California

Bruns Belmont Construction

San Jose, CA · ~52 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bruns Belmont Construction runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Bruns Belmont Construction: 3.7 TCR = 127% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bruns Belmont Construction safety composite

Bruns Belmont Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2016→2018

Bruns Belmont Construction injury rate improved

Bruns Belmont Construction's TCR fell 7.4 from 7.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.4 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.7 · 127% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #44/78
  • PHOTO Core Concepts, Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Core Concepts, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Bruns Belmont Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bruns Belmont Construction averages 3.7 TCR (127% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bruns Belmont Construction TCR series: 2016=7.4 · 2018=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Bruns Belmont Construction falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 78 Industrial building (except wa employers in California.

Bruns Belmont Construction (52 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bruns Belmont Construction
Bruns Belmont Construction (52 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Bruns Belmont Construction has fewer employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.4 4.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · CA · San Jose

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Core Concepts, Inc 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hercules Manufacturing Company 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anderson Development Company 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Salvajor Company 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Phil Foster Ranch 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Ivanhoe 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brassfield Estate Vineyard 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR 21 Robinson Street 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Faurecia Clean Mobility 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Element Houston 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Holland - JP 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Knoxville Distribution Center 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Battelle - Crystal City Operations 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE X-Press It Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE USF Tampa FL 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.