Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge · Virginia

Bryant Structures Inc.

Toano, VA · ~35 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bryant Structures Inc. runs at 474% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge workplace, earning a grade F.

Bryant Structures Inc.: 13.3 TCR = 474% of Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bryant Structures Inc. safety composite

Bryant Structures Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bryant Structures Inc.: 0.0 → 13.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 23.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.85× in 2024

Bryant Structures Inc.'s TCR rose 13.6 from 0.0 in 2018 to 13.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 23.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Toano, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.3 · 474% of ind

  • DART 11.3 DART
  • RANK #135/141
  • PHOTO Milwaukee General Co…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Milwaukee General Construction Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Bryant Structures Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bryant Structures Inc. averages 13.3 TCR (474% of the Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bryant Structures Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=23.6 · 2020=21.4 · 2021=15.8 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=13.6 · 2024=13.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Bryant Structures Inc. falls in its industry

4,078 Construction management, highw establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #135 safest of 141 Construction management, highw employers in Virginia.

Bryant Structures Inc. (35 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Bryant Structures Inc.
Bryant Structures Inc. (35 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Bryant Structures Inc. has fewer employees than the Construction management, highway, road, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.6 11.3 6 0 0
2023 13.6 2.3 5 1 0
2022 5.1 2.5 2 0 0
2021 15.8 9.4 5 0 0
2020 21.4 15.3 7 0 0
2019 23.6 15.7 6 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · VA · Toano

4,078 Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 15 employers in Toano, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Milwaukee General Construction Co., Inc. 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peek Pavement Marking Conway, SC 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Porter W. Yett Co. 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Region 3-Ashland 13.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE R S Coleman Lumber Company Inc 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clinch River 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fieldale Office 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shenandoah Division 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR AVID Medical 480 FTE
CITY-NEAR Owens & Minor Inc. 353 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Toano 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR OI 238 FTE
NAT-TCR Ncsou - Southern Pines Center 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hunter Douglas Fabrication Company 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ATACO Steel Products 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Loews Sapphire Falls Resort 13.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Concord Operations 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chapel Hill Operations 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phelps Fan LLC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE NOVA Commercial Interiors, Inc. 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.