Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly · Massachusetts

BSL North Attleborough Development LLC

North Attleboro, MA · ~89 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BSL North Attleborough Development LLC runs at 323% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly workplace, earning a grade F.

BSL North Attleborough Development LLC: 12.3 TCR = 323% of Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BSL North Attleborough Development LLC safety composite

BSL North Attleborough Development LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

BSL North Attleborough Development LLC: 0.0 → 17.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 19.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.4× in 2023

BSL North Attleborough Development LLC's TCR rose 17.2 from 0.0 in 2017 to 17.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 19.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · North Attleboro, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 323% of ind

  • DART 17.2 DART
  • RANK #161/210
  • PHOTO Lewiston Senior Living
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lewiston Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

BSL North Attleborough Development LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BSL North Attleborough Development LLC averages 12.3 TCR (323% of the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BSL North Attleborough Development LLC TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=9.8 · 2020=19.9 · 2021=16.4 · 2022=19.2 · 2023=17.2 · BLS 3.8

Where BSL North Attleborough Development LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted Living Facilities for establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #161 safest of 210 Assisted Living Facilities for employers in Massachusetts.

BSL North Attleborough Development LLC (89 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate BSL North Attleborough Development LLC
BSL North Attleborough Development LLC (89 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

BSL North Attleborough Development LLC has more employees than the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elder median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 17.2 17.2 2 8 0
2022 19.2 17.4 6 5 0
2021 16.4 14.7 6 4 0
2020 19.9 19.9 1 11 0
2019 9.8 8.2 6 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · North Attleboro

6,510 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 44 employers in North Attleboro, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lewiston Senior Living 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR FM Clearwater Springs, LLC 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vineyard FG MC Care Properties, LLC 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Imboden Creek Gardens Assisted Living 12.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1-EMP-Billerica 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shire - Milford MA 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sealed Air 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bixby International Corp 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hockomock Area YMCA 597 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2366 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2366 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1190 - North Attleborough 219 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 0563 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-01917 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Buford Warehouse 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 354180-Jamestown Po 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harmon Construction 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anthology of Wheaton 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hammond Services 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pregis - SG Polymask 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.