Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Illinois

Pregis - SG Polymask

Aurora, IL · ~89 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pregis - SG Polymask runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Pregis - SG Polymask: 1.8 TCR = 55% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pregis - SG Polymask safety composite

Pregis - SG Polymask scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Pregis - SG Polymask held a steady TCR band

Pregis - SG Polymask's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.7 in 2017 to 2.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.7 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Aurora, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/86
  • PHOTO Murfreesboro Container
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Murfreesboro Container (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Pregis - SG Polymask in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pregis - SG Polymask averages 1.8 TCR (55% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pregis - SG Polymask TCR series: 2017=1.7 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=3 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Pregis - SG Polymask falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 86 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Illinois.

Pregis - SG Polymask (89 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Pregis - SG Polymask
Pregis - SG Polymask (89 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Pregis - SG Polymask has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.0 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 3 0 0
2019 2.7 0.0 3 0 0
2018 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2017 1.7 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · IL · Aurora

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 325 employers in Aurora, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Murfreesboro Container 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Hartford 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOUTH GATE, CA 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jamesburg - D014 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Decatur 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE NG Des Plaines Reporting Center 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mundelein 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Macon GC LLC 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indian Prairie School District 204 3,309 FTE
CITY-NEAR Factor Aurora 2,167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rush Copley Medical Center, Inc. 2,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR ANDY FRAIN SERVICES INC 2,100 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #397 NORFOLK, VA 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1595 DUNDALK, MD 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Michels Power Inc-WI-Lomira 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #335 GREENVILLE, SC 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hammond Services 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Georgia Hardwoods Inc 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunny Delight Beverages 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE BSL North Attleborough Development LLC 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.