Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Michigan

Bickford of Okemos (Lansing)

Okemos, MI · ~39 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bickford of Okemos (Lansing) runs at 434% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bickford of Okemos (Lansing): 16.5 TCR = 434% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bickford of Okemos (Lansing) safety composite

Bickford of Okemos (Lansing) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bickford of Okemos (Lansing): 4.1 → 13.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 27.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.84× in 2021

Bickford of Okemos (Lansing)'s TCR rose 9.9 from 4.1 in 2016 to 13.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 27.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Okemos, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.5 · 434% of ind

  • DART 13.9 DART
  • RANK #83/97
  • PHOTO Heritage Oaks of Eng…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage Oaks of Englewood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Bickford of Okemos (Lansing) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bickford of Okemos (Lansing) averages 16.5 TCR (434% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bickford of Okemos (Lansing) TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2018=24.6 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=27.6 · 2021=13.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Bickford of Okemos (Lansing) falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 97 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Michigan.

Bickford of Okemos (Lansing) (39 employees, TCR 16.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bickford of Okemos (Lansing)
Bickford of Okemos (Lansing) (39 employees, TCR 16.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Bickford of Okemos (Lansing) has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 13.9 13.9 3 1 0
2020 27.6 18.4 2 4 0
2019 12.3 4.1 3 0 0
2018 24.6 16.4 6 0 0
2016 4.1 4.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MI · Okemos

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 40 employers in Okemos, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage Oaks of Englewood 16.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line 16.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buffalo Valley Lutheran Village 16.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit Glen 16.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Hope Dairy 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFI - Livonia 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dart Facilities 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cripps Fontaine Excavating, INC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michigan Public Health Institute 804 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ingham County Medical Care Facility 372 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer Inc 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR 025 - Okemos 282 FTE
NAT-TCR 4769-68-Pottery Barn Kids 16.5 TCR
NAT-TCR General Beer-Northwest, Inc.-Barron 16.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Cochran Oil Mill & Ginnery 16.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wenatchee (Wawna) 16.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bickford of Ames 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bickford of Omaha 2 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bickford of Rockford 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orange Line Oil 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.