Bricklaying contractors · Minnesota

Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis

Roseville, MN · ~98 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bricklaying contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis: 2.5 TCR = 91% of Bricklaying contractors BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis safety composite

Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2023→2024

Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis injury rate improved

Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis's TCR fell 3.0 from 4.0 in 2023 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=4.0 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238140 · Roseville, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 91% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #5/22
  • PHOTO Seedorff Masonry, Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Seedorff Masonry, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis averages 2.5 TCR (91% of the Bricklaying contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis TCR series: 2023=4 · 2024=1 · BLS 2.8

Where Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis falls in its industry

703 Bricklaying contractors establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 22 Bricklaying contractors employers in Minnesota.

Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis (98 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis
Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis (98 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis has more employees than the Bricklaying contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2023 4.0 2.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238140 · MN · Roseville

703 Bricklaying contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 239 employers in Roseville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Seedorff Masonry, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR T.A.G. Construction, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR M3, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Masonry IV, Inc. 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Revol Greens MN, LLC 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greystone Construction 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Tex Electric, Inc. 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aspire Bakeries- Chaska, MN 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro District 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR Park Dental/The Dental Specialist 1,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Veritas Technologies LLC - Roseville 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2101 - Roseville T1 509 FTE
NAT-TCR Norman Filter Company & Norman Equipment Company 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR O&M, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Continental Automotive Systems, Inc 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR More Consulting Corp. 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Horizon Manufacturing Group 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avista Jimmie Dean 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Malibu Jacks Ashland 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Hoffman Estates 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.