Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production · California

Bullseye Farms LLC

Woodland, CA · ~37 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bullseye Farms LLC runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production workplace, earning a grade A.

Bullseye Farms LLC: 1.2 TCR = 26% of Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bullseye Farms LLC safety composite

Bullseye Farms LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bullseye Farms LLC: 0.0 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.92× in 2024

Bullseye Farms LLC's TCR rose 2.2 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111219 · Woodland, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 26% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #4/175
  • PHOTO L&M Farms of South F…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: L&M Farms of South Florida, LLC-Labelle (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Bullseye Farms LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bullseye Farms LLC averages 1.2 TCR (26% of the Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bullseye Farms LLC TCR series: 2017=0 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Bullseye Farms LLC falls in its industry

331 Tomato farming (except under c establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 175 Tomato farming (except under c employers in California.

Bullseye Farms LLC (37 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bullseye Farms LLC
Bullseye Farms LLC (37 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Bullseye Farms LLC has fewer employees than the Tomato farming (except under cover), fie median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.9 5.9 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111219 · CA · Woodland

331 Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 172 employers in Woodland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR L&M Farms of South Florida, LLC-Labelle 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lettuce 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sira Naturals, Inc 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cauliflower 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE KP Spraying LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN - 01 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kimberlina Shop 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastline Berry Farms, Inc 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 800 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0555 - Woodland CA DC 1,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0555 - Sacramento DC 1,196 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030173 820 FTE
NAT-TCR NGMS-N740 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Continental Construction, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Village farms Marfa 1 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR John Darr Mechanical 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Boca Raton 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodson Paving, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pennington County Government Center 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Justice & Company 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.