Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) contractors · California

Bulwark Construction, Inc.

Corona, CA · ~384 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bulwark Construction, Inc. runs at 414% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Bulwark Construction, Inc.: 11.6 TCR = 414% of Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bulwark Construction, Inc. safety composite

Bulwark Construction, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Bulwark Construction, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Bulwark Construction, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.2 from 11.8 in 2018 to 11.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.8 · 2019=10.8 · 2022=11.1 · 2023=12.3 · 2024=11.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238310 · Corona, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 414% of ind

  • DART 9.4 DART
  • RANK #211/228
  • PHOTO Builders' Insulation…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 168 inj
  • SIZE ~384 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Builders' Insulation of Oregon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Bulwark Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bulwark Construction, Inc. averages 11.6 TCR (414% of the Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bulwark Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2018=11.8 · 2019=10.8 · 2022=11.1 · 2023=12.3 · 2024=11.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Bulwark Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

1,613 Plastering (i.e., ornamental, establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #211 safest of 228 Plastering (i.e., ornamental, employers in California.

Bulwark Construction, Inc. (384 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bulwark Construction, Inc.
Bulwark Construction, Inc. (384 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Bulwark Construction, Inc. has more employees than the Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) con median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.9 9.4 33 0 0
2023 12.3 11.5 29 0 0
2022 11.1 10.8 30 0 0
2019 10.8 8.6 30 0 0
2018 11.8 9.3 46 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238310 · CA · Corona

1,613 Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 409 employers in Corona, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Builders' Insulation of Oregon 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BAS Walls and Ceilings 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norco 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nova Brothers, Inc. 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Joe Campos 384 FTE
STATE-SIZE AASC 384 FTE
STATE-SIZE VSPOne Sacramento 384 FTE
STATE-SIZE GH Foods Sacramento 384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2535 Anselmo Dr 2,572 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company - Anselmo Dr, Corona 2,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 289 1,587 FTE
NAT-TCR ILC033 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NA-US-MA-Wilmington-240 Ballardvale 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Canton Drop Forge 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Maple Valley Dementia Care 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cassia Regional Hospital 384 FTE
NAT-SIZE FreshPoint Dallas 384 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jabil Inc 384 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moravian Hall Square 384 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.