Environmental protection program administration · Connecticut

Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse

Hartford, CT · ~137 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Environmental protection program administration workplace, earning a grade A.

Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Environmental protection program administration BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse safety composite

Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse held a steady TCR band

Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924110 · Hartford, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/15
  • PHOTO Bureau of Materials …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~137 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bureau of Materials Management & Compliance Assurance (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Environmental protection program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse falls in its industry

131 Environmental protection progr establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 15 Environmental protection progr employers in Connecticut.

Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse (137 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse
Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse (137 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse has more employees than the Environmental protection program adminis median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.2 1.2 0 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924110 · CT · Hartford

131 Environmental protection program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 270 employers in Hartford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bureau of Materials Management & Compliance Assurance 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division of Fiscal Services 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sims/Aycock 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Executive Division 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE American Electro Products Inc. 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southwest Mold, Inc dba Seitz 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coherent | Nufern 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2938 LOWE S OF LISBON CT 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARTFORD HOSPITAL 7,842 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital 4,674 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAZ Parking California, LLC 4,117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hartford-Saint Francis Hospital 3,165 FTE
NAT-TCR JM Technology Center 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sherer Cottage 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR VT Miltope Hope Hull Office 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Region 004 Design/Estimating 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Ford Meter Box Company, Inc. (Pell City) 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE willamette construction services inc. 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fellowship Square Historic Mesa 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ms Care Center of Alcorn County 137 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.