Pole line construction · Florida

C and C Power Line, Inc.

Jacksonville, FL · ~91 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

C and C Power Line, Inc. runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pole line construction workplace, earning a grade A.

C and C Power Line, Inc.: 0.9 TCR = 34% of Pole line construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

C and C Power Line, Inc. safety composite

C and C Power Line, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2024

C and C Power Line, Inc. injury rate improved

C and C Power Line, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Jacksonville, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/98
  • PHOTO Daybreak Solar Farm
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Daybreak Solar Farm (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

C and C Power Line, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows C and C Power Line, Inc. averages 0.9 TCR (34% of the Pole line construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

C and C Power Line, Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where C and C Power Line, Inc. falls in its industry

1,605 Pole line construction establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 98 Pole line construction employers in Florida.

C and C Power Line, Inc. (91 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate C and C Power Line, Inc.
C and C Power Line, Inc. (91 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

C and C Power Line, Inc. has more employees than the Pole line construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.5 0.7 2 0 0
2019 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2016 1.9 0.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · FL · Jacksonville

1,605 Pole line construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Daybreak Solar Farm 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linetec Services LLC - Linetec South 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CCI Systems 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pacific Tomato Growers, Ltd. - Farm Direct 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crystal River South Fossil Plant 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turkey Point Plant Fossil 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE ML3 Brevard Service Center 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR Pekin 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Los Medanos Energy Center 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR NA Motor Graders Facility 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Topeka Sc 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store #43 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Catherine LaBoure 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Headquarters 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.