Electric light and power plant (except hydroelectric) construction · Tennessee

Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project

Gallatin, TN · ~95 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric light and power plant (except hydroelectric) construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project: 0.9 TCR = 34% of Electric light and power plant (except hydroelectric) construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project safety composite

Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2018→2019

Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project injury rate improved

Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.3 in 2018 to 0.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.3 · 2019=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Gallatin, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #5/26
  • PHOTO C and C Power Line, …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C and C Power Line, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project averages 0.9 TCR (34% of the Electric light and power plant (except hydroelectric) construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project TCR series: 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project falls in its industry

1,605 Electric light and power plant establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 26 Electric light and power plant employers in Tennessee.

Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project (95 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project
Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project (95 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project has more employees than the Electric light and power plant (except h median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2018 1.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · TN · Gallatin

1,605 Electric light and power plant (except hydroelectric) construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 100 employers in Gallatin, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C and C Power Line, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daybreak Solar Farm 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linetec Services LLC - Linetec South 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CCI Systems 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE GP Vaccination (Loretto) 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Memphis, TN HVAC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE F. L. Crane & Sons, Inc. Memphis 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sumner Regional Medical Center LLC 1,068 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gap Inc. - Central Omni 919 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gap Inc. - Gallatin Tennessee Omni 757 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tennessee Fulfillment Center 735 FTE
NAT-TCR 3029 Keystone 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Duro Bag - Florence 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CardioFocus 500 Nickerson 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Corning Optical Communications RF LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fagron Sterile Services 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Direct Plastics - Coldwater 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Customer Solutions Center 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Copper and Brass Sales - Acworth 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.