Utility Company · California

CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10

Rosemead, CA · ~1,117 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10 runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility Company workplace, earning a grade C.

CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10: 0.6 TCR = 87% of Utility Company BLS 0.7 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10 safety composite

CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2024

CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10 injury rate improved

CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.1 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Rosemead, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 0.6 · 87% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #62/183
  • PHOTO S09204 - Centralized…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~1,117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S09204 - Centralized Dispatch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10 averages 0.6 TCR (87% of the Utility Company BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10 TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 0.7

Where CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10 falls in its industry

1,475 Utility Company establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 183 Utility Company employers in California.

CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10 (1,117 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10
CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10 (1,117 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10 has more employees than the Utility Company median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.3 6 0 0
2023 0.6 0.5 5 1 0
2022 0.3 0.3 2 1 0
2021 0.3 0.1 1 2 0
2020 0.4 0.1 0 4 0
2019 0.7 0.1 2 5 0
2018 0.5 0.2 4 1 0
2017 0.9 0.2 6 3 0
2016 1.1 0.3 3 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · CA · Rosemead

1,475 Utility Company employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 51 employers in Rosemead, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S09204 - Centralized Dispatch 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Home Office 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR King Arthur Baking Co., Inc. - Excalibur, Pendragon, Offsite 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michelin North America, Inc. - Corporate Site 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hartnell College Castroville Campus 1,117 FTE
STATE-SIZE S.H. SMITH FARMS INC 1,118 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMN Healthcare, Inc. 1,116 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2004-00001430 1,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 597 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 603 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 260 2,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-019 909 FTE
NAT-TCR Hemphill Home Care 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hoefler Communications,Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkwood in the Pines 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HDS Pods 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Paest - Abe Hub 1,117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Maine Medical Center 1,117 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Dow Chemical Company - Deer Park, TX 1,117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doctors Hospital 1,117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.