Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · California

CA-La Fresa Substation

Torrance, CA · ~20 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CA-La Fresa Substation runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

CA-La Fresa Substation: 2.7 TCR = 223% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CA-La Fresa Substation safety composite

CA-La Fresa Substation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CA-La Fresa Substation: 0.0 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 9.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.54× in 2024

CA-La Fresa Substation's TCR rose 4.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Torrance, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.7 · 223% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #31/41
  • PHOTO Trinity Valley Elect…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CA-La Fresa Substation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CA-La Fresa Substation averages 2.7 TCR (223% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CA-La Fresa Substation TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=9.3 · 2020=0 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 1.2

Where CA-La Fresa Substation falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 41 Electric power generation, fos employers in California.

CA-La Fresa Substation (20 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CA-La Fresa Substation
CA-La Fresa Substation (20 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

CA-La Fresa Substation has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.3 4.6 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · CA · Torrance

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 332 employers in Torrance, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chugach Electric 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milbank CSC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pineville Apparatus Maintenance 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sills Farms, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE F A Maggiore & Sons, LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CALMEX CONTRACTING INC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Velvet Antler Ranch LLC 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harbor-UCLA Medical Center 4,144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Torrance Memorial Medical Center 3,808 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 494 2,621 FTE
NAT-TCR 452 - St Charles 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lafayette Venetian Blind, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Springfield Mo - 225 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lisle 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ohio Valley Integration Services, Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Florida CirTech - Greeley 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ofallo-B5510-Afh- O Fallon Store 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Ulm Dental Clinic 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.