Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Texas

Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative

Kaufman, TX · ~185 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative runs at 224% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative: 2.7 TCR = 224% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative safety composite

Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative: 1.1 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2024

Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative's TCR rose 0.9 from 1.1 in 2018 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Kaufman, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.7 · 224% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #72/86
  • PHOTO Chugach Electric
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~185 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chugach Electric (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative averages 2.7 TCR (224% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative TCR series: 2018=1.1 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2 · BLS 1.2

Where Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #72 safest of 86 Electric power generation, fos employers in Texas.

Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative (185 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative
Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative (185 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 4 0 0
2023 2.7 2.2 5 0 0
2022 4.9 0.0 8 1 0
2018 1.1 0.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · TX · Kaufman

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 22 employers in Kaufman, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chugach Electric 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA-La Fresa Substation 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jamestown CSC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00714 CASPER CUST SVC CNTR 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Taylor Morrison 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advantages Associated Inc. 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE Richard Automation, LLC 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chamberlin Austin, LLC 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4164 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4164 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR KLLM Transport Services (Kaufman, TX) 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR 002 Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Kaufman 196 FTE
NAT-TCR Pilot Plant and Semi Works (Chemical Manufacturing) 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Terex - Washington - B6 / B7 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TCW inc 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dometic Corp - Greenbrier 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE DCAZ 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coquille Valley Hospital 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Utah 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pfeiffer Vacuum, Inc 185 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.