Utility Company · California

CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison

Shaver Lake, CA · ~25 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility Company workplace, earning a grade C.

CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison: 1.2 TCR = 98% of Utility Company BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison safety composite

CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison held a steady TCR band

CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221121 · Shaver Lake, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.2 · 98% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/69
  • PHOTO Chillicothe Tranm an…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chillicothe Tranm and Telecom (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison averages 1.2 TCR (98% of the Utility Company BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison falls in its industry

263 Utility Company establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 69 Utility Company employers in California.

CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison (25 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison
CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison (25 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2

CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison has fewer employees than the Utility Company median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 5.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221121 · CA · Shaver Lake

263 Utility Company employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 employers in Shaver Lake, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chillicothe Tranm and Telecom 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA-Lighthipe Substation 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Headquarters 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NMD Main 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conservation Farms Ranches 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE GM Ag Services, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm Shop 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dougherty Brothers 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 187 1,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR HELMS GARAGE 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-Shaver Lake S/C 16 FTE
NAT-TCR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Health System Inc 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR M.J. Design Associates, INC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Suncor Energy, USA 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sears Contract, Inc. - Charlotte 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE DBA Hillview Senior Living 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE White Plumbing Co Inc 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Somaschini North America LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lester M. Prange, Inc. 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.