Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · California

CA-Shaver Lake S/C

Shaver Lake, CA · ~16 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CA-Shaver Lake S/C runs at 481% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

CA-Shaver Lake S/C: 5.8 TCR = 481% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CA-Shaver Lake S/C safety composite

CA-Shaver Lake S/C scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2016→2024

CA-Shaver Lake S/C injury rate improved

CA-Shaver Lake S/C's TCR fell 4.0 from 8.1 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.1 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=10.1 · 2024=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Shaver Lake, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.8 · 481% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #39/41
  • PHOTO High Bridge Combined…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~16 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: High Bridge Combined Cycle-SK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CA-Shaver Lake S/C in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CA-Shaver Lake S/C averages 5.8 TCR (481% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CA-Shaver Lake S/C TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=0 · 2020=10.1 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 1.2

Where CA-Shaver Lake S/C falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 41 Electric power generation, fos employers in California.

CA-Shaver Lake S/C (16 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CA-Shaver Lake S/C
CA-Shaver Lake S/C (16 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

CA-Shaver Lake S/C has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2020 10.1 5.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.7 6.7 1 0 0
2016 8.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · CA · Shaver Lake

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 employers in Shaver Lake, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR High Bridge Combined Cycle-SK 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Welsh Plant 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA-Corp Whse - Ventura 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mankato Energy Center 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CANAL RANCH FARMS, INC. 16 FTE
STATE-SIZE ESPINOZA FLC 16 FTE
STATE-SIZE RAM G LABOR CONTRACTING 16 FTE
STATE-SIZE VF - Santa Maria 16 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 187 1,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR HELMS GARAGE 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison 25 FTE
NAT-TCR Alpine Roofing LTD. 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Residence Inn by Marriott Las Vegas Hughes Center 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Williamsport Md 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast Traffic Control 5.8 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.