wired telecommunication carriers · California

CA_Van Nuys_14221 Covello St._ADLA0012

Van Nuys, CA · ~435 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CA_Van Nuys_14221 Covello St._ADLA0012 runs at 351% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical wired telecommunication carriers workplace, earning a grade F.

CA_Van Nuys_14221 Covello St._ADLA0012: 2.5 TCR = 351% of wired telecommunication carriers BLS 0.7 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CA_Van Nuys_14221 Covello St._ADLA0012 safety composite

CA_Van Nuys_14221 Covello St._ADLA0012 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2022→2024

CA_Van Nuys_14221 Covello St._ADLA0012 injury rate improved

CA_Van Nuys_14221 Covello St._ADLA0012's TCR fell 1.4 from 2.4 in 2022 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.4 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517111 · Van Nuys, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.5 · 351% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #10/42
  • PHOTO MS - Ridgeland, 121 …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~435 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MS - Ridgeland, 121 Marketridge Drive (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CA_Van Nuys_14221 Covello St._ADLA0012 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CA_Van Nuys_14221 Covello St._ADLA0012 averages 2.5 TCR (351% of the wired telecommunication carriers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CA_Van Nuys_14221 Covello St._ADLA0012 TCR series: 2022=2.4 · 2023=4 · 2024=1 · BLS 0.7

Where CA_Van Nuys_14221 Covello St._ADLA0012 falls in its industry

455 wired telecommunication carrie establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 42 wired telecommunication carrie employers in California.

CA_Van Nuys_14221 Covello St._ADLA0012 (435 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate CA_Van Nuys_14221 Covello St._ADLA0012
CA_Van Nuys_14221 Covello St._ADLA0012 (435 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0

CA_Van Nuys_14221 Covello St._ADLA0012 has fewer employees than the wired telecommunication carriers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.5 4 0 0
2023 4.0 0.2 18 0 0
2022 2.4 0.0 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517111 · CA · Van Nuys

455 wired telecommunication carriers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 192 employers in Van Nuys, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MS - Ridgeland, 121 Marketridge Drive 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA - Pittsburg, 550 Garcia Ave 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MI - Plymouth, 41112 Concept Dr 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR WA - Vancouver, 6916 Ne 40th St 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE S & S HARVEST INC 435 FTE
STATE-SIZE General Atomics - Poway - A18 435 FTE
STATE-SIZE Super Store Industries 435 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2735 435 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Presbyterian Hospital 1,686 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-048 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-063 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR VAN NUYS HUB (CAVAN) 864 FTE
NAT-TCR CR Meyer - Rhinelander 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR PJP Marketplace #1 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Original Kevin Guidry Produce Market 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Lyon LLC - Corporate Location 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Herr Foods - 020 Production Nottingham 435 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tenneco Automotive 435 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baldwin Area Medical Center, Inc. 435 FTE
NAT-SIZE JVIS USA LLC Clinton Township 435 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.