Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · California

Division 9

El Monte, CA · ~435 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Division 9 runs at 345% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade F.

Division 9: 15.5 TCR = 345% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Division 9 safety composite

Division 9 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2024

Division 9 injury rate improved

Division 9's TCR fell 0.6 from 14.9 in 2017 to 14.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 20.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.9 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=20.5 · 2021=16.1 · 2022=16.8 · 2023=16.6 · 2024=14.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · El Monte, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.5 · 345% of ind

  • DART 10.4 DART
  • RANK #69/75
  • PHOTO Division 5
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 450 inj
  • SIZE ~435 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Division 5 (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Division 9 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Division 9 averages 15.5 TCR (345% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Division 9 TCR series: 2017=14.9 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=20.5 · 2021=16.1 · 2022=16.8 · 2023=16.6 · 2024=14.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Division 9 falls in its industry

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 75 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in California.

Division 9 (435 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Division 9
Division 9 (435 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Division 9 has more employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.3 10.4 69 19 0
2023 16.6 15.1 93 11 0
2022 16.8 11.3 62 23 0
2021 16.1 11.6 60 15 0
2020 20.5 13.4 64 22 0
2019 9.6 7.6 51 16 0
2017 14.9 10.0 51 29 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · CA · El Monte

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 71 employers in El Monte, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Division 5 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1953-4125 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Diego Metropolitan Transit System 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority - North Division 16.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE S & S HARVEST INC 435 FTE
STATE-SIZE General Atomics - Poway - A18 435 FTE
STATE-SIZE Super Store Industries 435 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2735 435 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 231 2,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DPS1 1,431 FTE
CITY-NEAR CMS Telstar 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR D Longo, LLC dba Longo Toyota 612 FTE
NAT-TCR Euphrates Inc 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Cameron Tool Company, LLC 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakefield Veterinary Group - 119 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Clackamas, OR 15.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Muncy Valley Hospital 435 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interface Flor LLC Rca 435 FTE
NAT-SIZE Public Service Building 435 FTE
NAT-SIZE SUMCO 435 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.