Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Cadence at Marietta

Phoenix, AZ · ~126 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cadence at Marietta runs at 262% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cadence at Marietta: 10.0 TCR = 262% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cadence at Marietta safety composite

Cadence at Marietta scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−29.9

2020→2022

Cadence at Marietta injury rate improved

Cadence at Marietta's TCR fell 29.9 from 29.9 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 29.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=29.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 262% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #105/173
  • PHOTO Brookdale Plymouth
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Plymouth (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Cadence at Marietta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cadence at Marietta averages 10.0 TCR (262% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cadence at Marietta TCR series: 2020=29.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Cadence at Marietta falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #105 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Cadence at Marietta (126 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cadence at Marietta
Cadence at Marietta (126 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cadence at Marietta has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 29.9 29.9 0 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Phoenix

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Plymouth 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silvercrest at Woodlands Creek 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Landings of Georgetown 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HP Burlington Properties, LLC 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Door Sales & Installation 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Building Group 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHOENIX AZ PLANT 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE CANTEX INC. Kingman 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0030-0030-04008 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-02219 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-02310 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0020-0023-02987 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #619 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Serta Dormae Products Lockhart 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #849 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cenveo Jersey City 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.