Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Brookdale Plymouth

Plymouth, MN · ~42 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Plymouth runs at 262% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Plymouth: 10.0 TCR = 262% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Plymouth safety composite

Brookdale Plymouth scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.7

2017→2024

Brookdale Plymouth injury rate improved

Brookdale Plymouth's TCR fell 8.7 from 14.5 in 2017 to 5.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 23.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.5 · 2018=9.0 · 2019=12.1 · 2020=23.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=11.5 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Plymouth, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 262% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #172/240
  • PHOTO Silvercrest at Woodl…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silvercrest at Woodlands Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Plymouth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Plymouth averages 10.0 TCR (262% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Plymouth TCR series: 2017=14.5 · 2018=9 · 2019=12.1 · 2020=23.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=11.5 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Plymouth falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #172 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Brookdale Plymouth (42 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Plymouth
Brookdale Plymouth (42 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Plymouth has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 2.9 2 0 0
2023 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 11.5 8.6 3 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 23.9 23.9 1 7 0
2019 12.1 4.8 5 0 0
2018 9.0 9.0 3 0 0
2017 14.5 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Plymouth

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 321 employers in Plymouth, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silvercrest at Woodlands Creek 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cadence at Marietta 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Landings of Georgetown 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HP Burlington Properties, LLC 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Michael Foods Inc.- GY2 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redwood Falls, MN-PS 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willmar Municipal Utilities 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benson Power, LLC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence Service LLC 3,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR EP SH Plymouth MN 2,084 FTE
CITY-NEAR EP / SH Plymouth MN 1,982 FTE
CITY-NEAR CN Plymouth 1,565 FTE
NAT-TCR Rite Aid Distribution Center 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeland Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Masonry, Inc. 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Willows at Harrodsburg 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fisher Cast Steel Products, Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wyatt-Quarles Seed Company 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE LaPorte Hydrocarbon Mix Plant 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colt Refining, Inc. Star Drive 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.