General Warehousing and Storage · California

Cafnn - Ups Mail Innovations - Rpf 01

Fontana, CA · ~55 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cafnn - Ups Mail Innovations - Rpf 01 runs at 8% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Cafnn - Ups Mail Innovations - Rpf 01: 0.5 TCR = 8% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cafnn - Ups Mail Innovations - Rpf 01 safety composite

Cafnn - Ups Mail Innovations - Rpf 01 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cafnn - Ups Mail Innovations - Rpf 01 held a steady TCR band

Cafnn - Ups Mail Innovations - Rpf 01's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Fontana, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 8% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/1131
  • PHOTO National Distributio…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: National Distribution Centers LLC-2600 McCree (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Cafnn - Ups Mail Innovations - Rpf 01 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cafnn - Ups Mail Innovations - Rpf 01 averages 0.5 TCR (8% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cafnn - Ups Mail Innovations - Rpf 01 TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Cafnn - Ups Mail Innovations - Rpf 01 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 1131 General Warehousing and Storag employers in California.

Cafnn - Ups Mail Innovations - Rpf 01 (55 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cafnn - Ups Mail Innovations - Rpf 01
Cafnn - Ups Mail Innovations - Rpf 01 (55 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Cafnn - Ups Mail Innovations - Rpf 01 has fewer employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Fontana

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 363 employers in Fontana, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-2600 McCree 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LBC Baton Rouge 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ALLENWOOD PA DISTRIBUTION CENTER 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mohawk Industries: Dalton GA Antioch 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE FARMING ADMINISTRATION 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dwelley Family Farms LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Valley Vineyard Management 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cornerstone Certified Vineyard 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LAX9 2,844 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LAX9 2,645 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08880314 FONTANA MEDICAL CENTER 2,635 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-08180314 2,236 FTE
NAT-TCR Orpra - Portland Service Center 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fulcrum Construction Services, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosemount Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 548 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Njbbx - Bound Brook Auto 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kygr4 - Dixie Warehouse 4 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kywbs - Dixie Warehouse 8 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jamestown Ny 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.