Landscape contractors (except construction) · California

Cagwin & Dorward Landscape Contractors

Petaluma, CA · ~519 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cagwin & Dorward Landscape Contractors runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Landscape contractors (except construction) workplace, earning a grade D.

Cagwin & Dorward Landscape Contractors: 7.8 TCR = 173% of Landscape contractors (except construction) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cagwin & Dorward Landscape Contractors safety composite

Cagwin & Dorward Landscape Contractors scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cagwin & Dorward Landscape Contractors: 7.5 → 8.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 8.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.92× in 2020

Cagwin & Dorward Landscape Contractors's TCR rose 0.6 from 7.5 in 2019 to 8.1 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Petaluma, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.8 · 173% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #292/448
  • PHOTO Timberline Landscaping
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 72 inj
  • SIZE ~519 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Timberline Landscaping (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Cagwin & Dorward Landscape Contractors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cagwin & Dorward Landscape Contractors averages 7.8 TCR (173% of the Landscape contractors (except construction) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cagwin & Dorward Landscape Contractors TCR series: 2019=7.5 · 2020=8.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Cagwin & Dorward Landscape Contractors falls in its industry

2,875 Landscape contractors (except establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #292 safest of 448 Landscape contractors (except employers in California.

Cagwin & Dorward Landscape Contractors (519 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cagwin & Dorward Landscape Contractors
Cagwin & Dorward Landscape Contractors (519 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Cagwin & Dorward Landscape Contractors has more employees than the Landscape contractors (except constructi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 8.1 7.2 35 1 0
2019 7.5 5.3 37 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · CA · Petaluma

2,875 Landscape contractors (except construction) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 153 employers in Petaluma, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Timberline Landscaping 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tree Tech Tree Service, Inc 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caretaker, Inc. 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 145020 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE SMFPW9646 SMF - PAX SERVICES 519 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freeport 519 FTE
STATE-SIZE 00006W WOODLAND 519 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sutter Health System Office (470-1017) 519 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 136 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 470 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 169 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Solairus Aviation 1,400 FTE
NAT-TCR 0002-Carolinas Rehabilitation Main 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Indianapolis DC 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Marinemax East, Inc.-Ft 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Reeve Cattle Company 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dubuque Customer Service 519 FTE
NAT-SIZE MRPG 519 FTE
NAT-SIZE Faircrest Steel Plant 519 FTE
NAT-SIZE Patheon Thermo Fisher 519 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.