General Freight Trucking Local · California

Cahar - Hayward Freight Forwarding

Hayward, CA · ~46 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cahar - Hayward Freight Forwarding runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Freight Trucking Local workplace, earning a grade C.

Cahar - Hayward Freight Forwarding: 5.1 TCR = 113% of General Freight Trucking Local BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cahar - Hayward Freight Forwarding safety composite

Cahar - Hayward Freight Forwarding scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cahar - Hayward Freight Forwarding: 0.0 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 12.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.54× in 2024

Cahar - Hayward Freight Forwarding's TCR rose 2.8 from 0.0 in 2019 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Hayward, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.1 · 113% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #126/264
  • PHOTO Chrysler Dallas TSP
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chrysler Dallas TSP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Cahar - Hayward Freight Forwarding in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cahar - Hayward Freight Forwarding averages 5.1 TCR (113% of the General Freight Trucking Local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cahar - Hayward Freight Forwarding TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=12 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=9.1 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Cahar - Hayward Freight Forwarding falls in its industry

2,784 General Freight Trucking Local establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #126 safest of 264 General Freight Trucking Local employers in California.

Cahar - Hayward Freight Forwarding (46 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cahar - Hayward Freight Forwarding
Cahar - Hayward Freight Forwarding (46 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Cahar - Hayward Freight Forwarding has fewer employees than the General Freight Trucking Local median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2022 9.1 9.1 4 0 0
2021 4.3 2.2 2 0 0
2020 12.0 8.0 5 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · CA · Hayward

2,784 General Freight Trucking Local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 336 employers in Hayward, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chrysler Dallas TSP 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chuck Bracelin Trucking, Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Sierra Express - Los Angeles 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gabler Trucking Inc 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Matteoli Brothers 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMR Farms-San Miguel 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Berry Farms 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pitigliano Farm Services, Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 518 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 100 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 117 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Rose Hospital 929 FTE
NAT-TCR Ncroc - Rocky Mount 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lashr - Shreveport 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Waatt - Boeing Field Temporary Facility 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kirkwood 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Molar - Sikeston Center 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kybrk - Scs-Brooks - 4033 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ksdge - Dodge City 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnston Industries Inc 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.