Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, local · California

California Sierra Express - Los Angeles

Compton, CA · ~33 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

California Sierra Express - Los Angeles runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, local workplace, earning a grade C.

California Sierra Express - Los Angeles: 5.1 TCR = 113% of Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, local BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

California Sierra Express - Los Angeles safety composite

California Sierra Express - Los Angeles scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2019→2024

California Sierra Express - Los Angeles injury rate improved

California Sierra Express - Los Angeles's TCR fell 5.8 from 8.8 in 2019 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=8.8 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=8.9 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Compton, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.1 · 113% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #125/264
  • PHOTO Chuck Bracelin Truck…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chuck Bracelin Trucking, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

California Sierra Express - Los Angeles in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows California Sierra Express - Los Angeles averages 5.1 TCR (113% of the Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

California Sierra Express - Los Angeles TCR series: 2019=8.8 · 2020=3 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=8.9 · 2024=3 · BLS 4.5

Where California Sierra Express - Los Angeles falls in its industry

2,784 Bulk mail truck transportation establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #125 safest of 264 Bulk mail truck transportation employers in California.

California Sierra Express - Los Angeles (33 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate California Sierra Express - Los Angeles
California Sierra Express - Los Angeles (33 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

California Sierra Express - Los Angeles has fewer employees than the Bulk mail truck transportation, contract median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2023 8.9 8.9 3 0 0
2022 4.6 4.6 2 0 0
2021 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2019 8.8 8.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · CA · Compton

2,784 Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 143 employers in Compton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chuck Bracelin Trucking, Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gabler Trucking Inc 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAHAR - HAYWARD FREIGHT FORWARDING 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chrysler Dallas TSP 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tutti Frutti Farms 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL CENTRO 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS 18 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-017 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR 430-DC006 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR 430-DC001 789 FTE
CITY-NEAR The People Concern - SOLAR 448 FTE
NAT-TCR Oaktree Consulting LLC 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1531 - Waco 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1214 - Washington Square 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MCF-Willow River 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coating Design Group 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE MiniTec Framing System LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Landscapes & Design, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stille Havn Hus, Inc 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.