Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) · California

Caitac Garment Processing, Inc.

Gardena, CA · ~227 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Caitac Garment Processing, Inc. runs at 304% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) workplace, earning a grade F.

Caitac Garment Processing, Inc.: 10.0 TCR = 304% of Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Caitac Garment Processing, Inc. safety composite

Caitac Garment Processing, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2017→2023

Caitac Garment Processing, Inc. injury rate improved

Caitac Garment Processing, Inc.'s TCR fell 7.0 from 13.5 in 2017 to 6.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.5 · 2023=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 315990 · Gardena, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 304% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Brookville Glove
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~227 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookville Glove (0.6 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Caitac Garment Processing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Caitac Garment Processing, Inc. averages 10.0 TCR (304% of the Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Caitac Garment Processing, Inc. TCR series: 2017=13.5 · 2023=6.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Caitac Garment Processing, Inc. falls in its industry

62 Apparel findings and trimmings establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Apparel findings and trimmings employers in California.

Caitac Garment Processing, Inc. (227 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Caitac Garment Processing, Inc.
Caitac Garment Processing, Inc. (227 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Caitac Garment Processing, Inc. has more employees than the Apparel findings and trimmings cut and s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.5 3.3 12 0 0
2017 13.5 10.7 29 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

315990 · CA · Gardena

62 Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 223 employers in Gardena, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookville Glove 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR STRATTON HATS 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bluespoke Warehouse 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ahead HQ 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Channel Islands Vegetable Farms, Inc. 227 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farming2 227 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Pacifico FLC, Inc 227 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hunter 227 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 602 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-030 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR GARDENA HUB (CAGAR) 809 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAGAR - GARDENA HUB 794 FTE
NAT-TCR Kokua Hospitality, OR LLC 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cambridge Village Associates 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown Valley Winery, Inc. 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Western Malting Pocatello 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goodrich Corporation (Spokane WA) 227 FTE
NAT-SIZE A Quality Facility Services 227 FTE
NAT-SIZE Call Center 227 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fiesta # 07 227 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.