Painting metals and metal products for the trade · Wisconsin

Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility

Saukville, WI · ~115 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Painting metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade B.

Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility: 2.1 TCR = 65% of Painting metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility safety composite

Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility: 0.0 → 4.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.3 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2018

Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility's TCR rose 4.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Saukville, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 65% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #5/56
  • PHOTO Specialty Coating Sy…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Specialty Coating Systems Austin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility averages 2.1 TCR (65% of the Painting metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility falls in its industry

646 Painting metals and metal prod establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 56 Painting metals and metal prod employers in Wisconsin.

Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility (115 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility
Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility (115 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility has more employees than the Painting metals and metal products for t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.3 4.3 5 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · WI · Saukville

646 Painting metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 28 employers in Saukville, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Specialty Coating Systems Austin 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Houston Unlimited 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt and Whitney Advanced Coating Technologies 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc - Tennessee Coatings 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE South Area and Beloit Ops 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scott Construction Inc. 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Construction, Inc - WI- Milwaukee 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Construction, Inc-WI-Franksville 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charter Steel- Saukville 708 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charter Steel Saukville 648 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1650 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1650 244 FTE
NAT-TCR Chop Bcc 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Coral Gables Holdings, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kaman Aerostructures - Wichita 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #569 DE LAND, FL 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE ASR Group Cleveland 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0264 - Int. Doors-Ozark 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE UG2 - 595 - TD Garden (MA) 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salt-Watkins Glen 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.