Coating of metal and metal products with plastics for the trade · Texas

Specialty Coating Systems Austin

Austin, TX · ~29 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Specialty Coating Systems Austin runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Coating of metal and metal products with plastics for the trade workplace, earning a grade B.

Specialty Coating Systems Austin: 2.1 TCR = 65% of Coating of metal and metal products with plastics for the trade BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Specialty Coating Systems Austin safety composite

Specialty Coating Systems Austin scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Specialty Coating Systems Austin: 0.0 → 91.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 91.0 TCR · DART/TCR 42.74× in 2024

Specialty Coating Systems Austin's TCR rose 91.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 91.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 42.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 65% of ind

  • DART 91.0 DART
  • RANK #25/69
  • PHOTO Houston Unlimited
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Houston Unlimited (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Specialty Coating Systems Austin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Specialty Coating Systems Austin averages 2.1 TCR (65% of the Coating of metal and metal products with plastics for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Specialty Coating Systems Austin TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=91 · BLS 3.3

Where Specialty Coating Systems Austin falls in its industry

646 Coating of metal and metal pro establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 69 Coating of metal and metal pro employers in Texas.

Specialty Coating Systems Austin (29 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Specialty Coating Systems Austin
Specialty Coating Systems Austin (29 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Specialty Coating Systems Austin has fewer employees than the Coating of metal and metal products with median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 91.0 91.0 1 1 0
2023 5.4 2.7 2 0 0
2022 5.8 0.0 2 0 0
2021 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · TX · Austin

646 Coating of metal and metal products with plastics for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Houston Unlimited 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calibre, Inc. - Dekora Woods Facility 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt and Whitney Advanced Coating Technologies 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ellison Surface Technologies, Inc - Tennessee Coatings 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepper Dairy 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE SROOC Holding LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Logging, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Gelest 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Harvesting, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Hugh Chatham Memorial Hospital 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Walter R Earle Transit Company 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sugar Creek Ambulance Service 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Culligan - Elmira 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Creek Dairy 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE J. Lopez Construction 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.