Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses · California
California - C1
Ontario, CA · ~652 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 5.2
- Avg TCR
- 3.4
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
California - C1 runs at 154% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses workplace, earning a grade D.
California - C1: 5.2 TCR = 154% of Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses BLS 3.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)
California - C1 safety composite
California - C1 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
31/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- F 5.24 per 100 workers
Safer than 22% of industry peers
- DART rate
- F 4.15 per 100 workers
Safer than 29% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 50% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−1.2
2018→2020
California - C1 injury rate improved
California - C1's TCR fell 1.2 from 5.5 in 2018 to 4.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2018=5.5 · 2019=6.0 · 2020=4.3
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 454110 · Ontario, CA ABOVE-IND · MID
Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 154% of ind
- DART 4.2 DART
- RANK #4/9
- PHOTO Yamibuy NJFC
- BOOK 3y book
- INJ 102 inj
- SIZE ~652 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Yamibuy NJFC (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →
California - C1 in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
California - C1
5.2 TCR
- Yamibuy NJFC
Yamibuy NJFC
5.2 TCR
- Spartan Consul
Spartan Consulting Group, LLC
5.2 TCR
- 806 - EFC2 San
806 - EFC2 San Bernardino, CA
5.1 TCR
- Fanatics Retai
Fanatics Retail Group Fulfillment, LLC
5.1 TCR
What this shows California - C1 averages 5.2 TCR (154% of the Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses BLS benchmark).
California - C1 TCR series: 2018=5.5 · 2019=6 · 2020=4.3 · BLS 3.4
Where California - C1 falls in its industry
64 Electronic Shopping and Mail-O establishmentsSafer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.
Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 9 Electronic Shopping and Mail-O employers in California.
California - C1 has more employees than the Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order House median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 6.0 | 5.2 | 38 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 34 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
454110 · CA · Ontario
64 Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.