Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade · California

California Electroplating, Inc.

Name: California Electroplating, Inc. Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Los Angeles, CA · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 2.8
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

California Electroplating, Inc. runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

California Electroplating, Inc.: 2.8 TCR = 83% of Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

California Electroplating, Inc. safety composite

California Electroplating, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2020→2023

California Electroplating, Inc. injury rate improved

California Electroplating, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.2 from 4.2 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.2 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Los Angeles, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 83% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #26/74
PHOTO Dormax
BOOK 3y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dormax (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.8
Dormax

2.8
Quality Platin

2.7
Andarn Electro

2.7
3P Processing

2.7

What this shows California Electroplating, Inc. averages 2.8 TCR (83% of the Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

California Electroplating, Inc. TCR series: 2020=4.2 · 2022=4 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where California Electroplating, Inc. falls in its industry

585 Anodizing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 74 Anodizing metals and metal pro employers in California.

California Electroplating, Inc. (23 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

California Electroplating, Inc. has fewer employees than the Anodizing metals and metal products for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2023	0.0	0.0	0
2022	4.0	4.0	1
2020	4.2	0.0	1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · CA · Los Angeles

585 Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Dormax	GRANDVILLE, MI	2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc.	TULSA, OK	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Andarn Electro Service Inc	PATERSON, NJ	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	3P Processing LLC	WICHITA, KS	2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	James Diedrich Farms	FIREBAUGH	23 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Tri-Fanucchi Farms,LLC	BAKERSFIELD	23 FTE
STATE-SIZE	KAN2 - 04	FRESNO	23 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Kyer Farms	LODI	23 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Live Nation Worldwide, Inc.	Los Angeles	50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR	UC Los Angeles	Los Angeles	40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR	LADWP	Los Angeles	11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Los Angeles Department of Water and Power	Los Angeles	10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR	Urban N. Zink Contractor, Inc.	Chase, MD	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Atec, Inc.	Lebanon, IN	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Continental Envelope Corporation	Geneva, IL	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Cmr USA	Leetsdale, PA	2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	JP Custom Exteriors & Floors	Bluffdale, UT	23 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Adaptive Textiles	West Chester, PA	23 FTE
NAT-SIZE	The Paper Corporation	Des Moines, IA	23 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Mebane Lumber Building Supply	Mebane, NC	23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.