Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade · Oklahoma

Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc.

Tulsa, OK · ~48 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc. runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc.: 2.7 TCR = 83% of Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc. safety composite

Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2018→2024

Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc. injury rate improved

Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc.'s TCR fell 7.3 from 7.3 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.3 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Tulsa, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 83% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/9
  • PHOTO Andarn Electro Servi…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Andarn Electro Service Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc. averages 2.7 TCR (83% of the Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc. TCR series: 2018=7.3 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc. falls in its industry

585 Anodizing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 9 Anodizing metals and metal pro employers in Oklahoma.

Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc. (48 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc.
Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc. (48 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa, Inc. has fewer employees than the Anodizing metals and metal products for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.3 0.0 2 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2019 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2018 7.3 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · OK · Tulsa

585 Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Andarn Electro Service Inc 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CALIFORNIA ELECTROPLATING, INC. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3P Processing LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR US ANODIZE 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cimarron Feeders 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oklahoma City Office Area 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cactus Drilling Service Department 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mike Krebbs Construction 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR U.P. Fabricating Co., Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill Cupertino Store 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR E & B PAVING LLC - Noblesville 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenbrier 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Reichdrill LLC 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coppertail Brewing Co. LLC 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE RBC Bearings Southwest Products Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Excelco/Newbrook, Inc. 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.