Mechanical engineering services · California

California Environmental Systems, Inc.

Auburn, CA · ~49 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

California Environmental Systems, Inc. runs at 502% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mechanical engineering services workplace, earning a grade F.

California Environmental Systems, Inc.: 2.5 TCR = 502% of Mechanical engineering services BLS 0.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

California Environmental Systems, Inc. safety composite

California Environmental Systems, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

California Environmental Systems, Inc.: 1.6 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

California Environmental Systems, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.4 from 1.6 in 2017 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · Auburn, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.5 · 502% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #58/83
  • PHOTO Amee Bay LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amee Bay LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

California Environmental Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows California Environmental Systems, Inc. averages 2.5 TCR (502% of the Mechanical engineering services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

California Environmental Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2017=1.6 · 2018=2.4 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=2.2 · 2024=2 · BLS 0.5

Where California Environmental Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

690 Mechanical engineering service establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 83 Mechanical engineering service employers in California.

California Environmental Systems, Inc. (49 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate California Environmental Systems, Inc.
California Environmental Systems, Inc. (49 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

California Environmental Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Mechanical engineering services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2021 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2018 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2017 1.6 1.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · CA · Auburn

690 Mechanical engineering services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 96 employers in Auburn, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amee Bay LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Macro Lite 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineering California 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR New York City Department of Design & Construction: Staten Island 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE LAJES FARMS INC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunview Shandon 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rawah-Napa County 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Farms 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 37 2,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30095) 762 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health and Human Services 743 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital (110-4001) 676 FTE
NAT-TCR Milan-Deere Returns 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mission Linen Supply PHX 200 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Department of Human Resources 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR McCarthy Tents & Events 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 50079 - Capstone Unfi Lancaster 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pomp's Tire - KC Warehouse 125 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunnyview (Shared Services + MVS Admin + Warehouse) 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corsetti Structural Steel 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.