Administration of Public Health Pgm · California

Health and Human Services

Auburn, CA · ~743 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Health and Human Services runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Administration of Public Health Pgm workplace, earning a grade A.

Health and Human Services: 1.4 TCR = 43% of Administration of Public Health Pgm BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Health and Human Services safety composite

Health and Human Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2022

Health and Human Services injury rate improved

Health and Human Services's TCR fell 0.5 from 1.8 in 2017 to 1.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.8 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 923120 · Auburn, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #10/66
  • PHOTO Public & Mental Heal…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~743 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Public & Mental Health Departments (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Health and Human Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Health and Human Services averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the Administration of Public Health Pgm BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Health and Human Services TCR series: 2017=1.8 · 2018=1 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.2 · BLS 3.2

Where Health and Human Services falls in its industry

267 Administration of Public Healt establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 66 Administration of Public Healt employers in California.

Health and Human Services (743 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Health and Human Services
Health and Human Services (743 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Health and Human Services has more employees than the Administration of Public Health Pgm median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.2 0.7 8 1 0
2021 1.4 0.8 12 1 0
2020 1.5 1.0 11 0 0
2019 1.4 0.6 9 1 0
2018 1.0 1.0 7 0 0
2017 1.8 1.3 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

923120 · CA · Auburn

267 Administration of Public Health Pgm employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 96 employers in Auburn, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Public & Mental Health Departments 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vista Hill 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Health & Social Services (35) 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR HCA - BHS/Public Guardian 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CA029 743 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 319 742 FTE
STATE-SIZE OWB Packers 742 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Diamond Growers - Sacramento 744 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 37 2,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30095) 762 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital (110-4001) 676 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sheriff-Coroner Marshall Department 585 FTE
NAT-TCR USM Store #518 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Golden Valley PN Clinic 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Manchester Operating - 524 Atlantic Street Manchester, GA 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Crossroads IGA #779 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZOKP 743 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nephron Pharmaceuticals 743 FTE
NAT-SIZE NGTS-B102 743 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ach Lakeside Hospital 743 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.