Correctional institutions · Michigan

Gus Harrison Correctional Facility

Adrian, MI · ~463 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gus Harrison Correctional Facility runs at 572% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade F.

Gus Harrison Correctional Facility: 18.3 TCR = 572% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gus Harrison Correctional Facility safety composite

Gus Harrison Correctional Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

5/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 24.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Gus Harrison Correctional Facility: 8.1 → 66.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 66.6 TCR · DART/TCR 3.51× in 2022

Gus Harrison Correctional Facility's TCR rose 58.5 from 8.1 in 2016 to 66.6 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 3.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Adrian, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 18.3 · 572% of ind

  • DART 64.2 DART
  • RANK #24/31
  • PHOTO CDC MULE CREEK STATE…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 154 inj
  • SIZE ~463 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CDC MULE CREEK STATE PRISON (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Gus Harrison Correctional Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gus Harrison Correctional Facility averages 18.3 TCR (572% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gus Harrison Correctional Facility TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2017=6.2 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=44.8 · 2021=27.8 · 2022=66.6 · BLS 3.2

Where Gus Harrison Correctional Facility falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 31 Correctional institutions employers in Michigan.

Gus Harrison Correctional Facility (463 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Gus Harrison Correctional Facility
Gus Harrison Correctional Facility (463 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Gus Harrison Correctional Facility has more employees than the Correctional institutions median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 66.6 64.2 24 223 0
2021 27.8 24.1 32 83 0
2020 44.8 43.2 21 171 1
2019 4.6 3.3 20 1 0
2017 6.2 4.7 26 2 0
2016 8.1 5.2 31 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · MI · Adrian

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 78 employers in Adrian, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CDC MULE CREEK STATE PRISON 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Institution for Men 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR California State Prison-Los Angeles County 18.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Constellium 463 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delfield 463 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genesee Community Health Center 463 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genesee Community Health Center Atherton 463 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charles and Virginia Hickman Hospital 599 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bixby Hospital 583 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inteva Products 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lenawee County 513 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1152 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate/Warehouse 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ELITE Delivery Team 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Logging 18.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fischer Management, LLC 463 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACCO Brands - Lake Zurich 463 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2904-ASM-MN 463 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2904-SAS-MA 463 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.