Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing · California

Camarillo

Camarillo, CA · ~105 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Camarillo runs at 180% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Camarillo: 6.0 TCR = 180% of Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Camarillo safety composite

Camarillo scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Camarillo: 0.0 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 12.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2024

Camarillo's TCR rose 3.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Camarillo, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 180% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #63/98
  • PHOTO TRIPLE S AIR SYSTEMS…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TRIPLE S AIR SYSTEMS INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Camarillo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Camarillo averages 6.0 TCR (180% of the Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Camarillo TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=8 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=11.4 · 2022=12.3 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Camarillo falls in its industry

1,158 Air cowls, sheet metal (except establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 98 Air cowls, sheet metal (except employers in California.

Camarillo (105 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Camarillo
Camarillo (105 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Camarillo has more employees than the Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 2.6 4 0 0
2023 3.6 3.6 3 0 0
2022 12.3 9.9 5 5 0
2021 11.4 7.6 4 5 0
2020 5.9 4.4 4 0 0
2019 8.0 8.0 6 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2017 6.2 3.8 5 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · CA · Camarillo

1,158 Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Camarillo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TRIPLE S AIR SYSTEMS INC 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 451 Pepsi Road 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valtir, LLC 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Willcox Metal Fabricators, LLC 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Villa Park Riverside 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zion Harvest 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fowler Packing Farm Management 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE SATICOY BASE - 15 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-09 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 558 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California State University Channel Islands 1,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Channel Islands Social Services 1,488 FTE
NAT-TCR Waterworks 108 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Triple S Air Systems Inc 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Virginia Clinic 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Danone US LLC 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plymouth 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oliver Printing & Packaging 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Edina - Public Works 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro Transit Transfer Road & Police Department 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.