Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Illinois

Cambridge House of Maryville

Maryville, IL · ~47 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cambridge House of Maryville runs at 318% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cambridge House of Maryville: 12.1 TCR = 318% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cambridge House of Maryville safety composite

Cambridge House of Maryville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.1

2019→2024

Cambridge House of Maryville injury rate improved

Cambridge House of Maryville's TCR fell 12.1 from 14.4 in 2019 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=14.4 · 2020=16.6 · 2023=15.0 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Maryville, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.1 · 318% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #173/217
  • PHOTO Cascade Inn
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cascade Inn (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Cambridge House of Maryville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cambridge House of Maryville averages 12.1 TCR (318% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cambridge House of Maryville TCR series: 2019=14.4 · 2020=16.6 · 2023=15 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Cambridge House of Maryville falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #173 safest of 217 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Illinois.

Cambridge House of Maryville (47 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cambridge House of Maryville
Cambridge House of Maryville (47 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cambridge House of Maryville has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2023 15.0 0.0 6 0 0
2020 16.6 16.6 0 6 0
2019 14.4 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IL · Maryville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 12 employers in Maryville, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cascade Inn 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Courtyard Towers Senior Living 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CELEBRATION VILLA OF MID VALLEY 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 60114 SUNRISE OF ORANGE 12.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1987-Jerseyville, IL (Monsanto Co.) 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stonington, IL-Mfg 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prairie Power, Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Distribution Operating - Decatur 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anderson Hospital 1,391 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anderson Healthcare Partners 1,306 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manor Court of Maryville 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMEREN ILLINOIS - Maryville 124 FTE
NAT-TCR Travis Industries 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon DGE9 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR burton + BURTON 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Honc Docks & Lifts, INC 12.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pismo Coast Village, Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arden Courts of San Antonio 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE J. Solotken & Co., Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arden Courts of Bath 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.