Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Courtyard Towers Senior Living

Mesa, AZ · ~81 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Courtyard Towers Senior Living runs at 318% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Courtyard Towers Senior Living: 12.1 TCR = 318% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Courtyard Towers Senior Living safety composite

Courtyard Towers Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Courtyard Towers Senior Living: 6.8 → 22.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 22.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.13× in 2021

Courtyard Towers Senior Living's TCR rose 15.4 from 6.8 in 2016 to 22.2 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mesa, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.1 · 318% of ind

  • DART 13.7 DART
  • RANK #133/173
  • PHOTO Cascade Inn
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cascade Inn (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Courtyard Towers Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Courtyard Towers Senior Living averages 12.1 TCR (318% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Courtyard Towers Senior Living TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=18.8 · 2021=22.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Courtyard Towers Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #133 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Courtyard Towers Senior Living (81 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Courtyard Towers Senior Living
Courtyard Towers Senior Living (81 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Courtyard Towers Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 22.2 13.7 7 6 0
2020 18.8 17.4 2 12 0
2019 9.7 2.8 6 1 0
2018 7.2 2.9 5 0 0
2017 7.9 7.9 6 1 0
2016 6.8 6.8 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Mesa

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 565 employers in Mesa, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cascade Inn 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cambridge House of Maryville 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CELEBRATION VILLA OF MID VALLEY 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 60114 SUNRISE OF ORANGE 12.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Carrot Plant 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ocotillo Powerplant 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE M. R. Tanner Construction 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE THREE PHASE ELECTRIC, LLC 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZ001 4,193 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZAPW9668 AZA - RAMP PAX 3,181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 04-290370278-2 1,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Police Department H210 1,651 FTE
NAT-TCR 9502 Avenue D 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SCI Services, LLC 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sterling Nevada, LLC 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ITS ConGlobal Savannah Prosperity (CGI) dba LanPort 12.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Benicia fabrication and machine 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Bay Hospice 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sports Molding Inc. 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ontario Phil 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.