Coolers or ice chests, plastics (except foam), manufacturing · North Carolina

Cambro Manufacturing Mebane

Mebane, NC · ~142 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cambro Manufacturing Mebane runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Coolers or ice chests, plastics (except foam), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Cambro Manufacturing Mebane: 4.2 TCR = 128% of Coolers or ice chests, plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cambro Manufacturing Mebane safety composite

Cambro Manufacturing Mebane scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2022→2024

Cambro Manufacturing Mebane injury rate improved

Cambro Manufacturing Mebane's TCR fell 3.1 from 6.3 in 2022 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=6.3 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Mebane, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 128% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #91/132
  • PHOTO Armstrong Mold Corpo…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~142 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Armstrong Mold Corporation FR1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Cambro Manufacturing Mebane in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cambro Manufacturing Mebane averages 4.2 TCR (128% of the Coolers or ice chests, plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cambro Manufacturing Mebane TCR series: 2022=6.3 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Cambro Manufacturing Mebane falls in its industry

2,838 Coolers or ice chests, plastic establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #91 safest of 132 Coolers or ice chests, plastic employers in North Carolina.

Cambro Manufacturing Mebane (142 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cambro Manufacturing Mebane
Cambro Manufacturing Mebane (142 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Cambro Manufacturing Mebane has more employees than the Coolers or ice chests, plastics (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 1.6 4 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 5 0 0
2022 6.3 5.1 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · NC · Mebane

2,838 Coolers or ice chests, plastics (except foam), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 71 employers in Mebane, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Armstrong Mold Corporation FR1 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tomric Systems Inc 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR OMICO Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR good natured Products (TEXAS) LLC dba FormTex Plastics 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shelco, LLC 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delta Contracting Inc. 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burford Construction North Carolina Statewide Operations 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Parton Lumber Company 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR GKN Alamance 912 FTE
CITY-NEAR IS - MFG US - Mebane, NC 642 FTE
CITY-NEAR Industrial Solutions : IS - MFG US - Mebane, NC 642 FTE
CITY-NEAR Industrial Connections and Solutions LLC 620 FTE
NAT-TCR Jc Machine, Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sofidel - Circleville 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR McCollum Farms, Inc 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR R & J Trucking Shelby Terminal 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 101-PL001 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wheels for Work LLC 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA-UT: Kilm 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Diego 142 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.