Nursing homes · North Carolina

Ashton Health and Rehabilitation

Mcleansville, NC · ~142 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ashton Health and Rehabilitation runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.

Ashton Health and Rehabilitation: 14.8 TCR = 228% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ashton Health and Rehabilitation safety composite

Ashton Health and Rehabilitation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−31.6

2017→2024

Ashton Health and Rehabilitation injury rate improved

Ashton Health and Rehabilitation's TCR fell 31.6 from 36.9 in 2017 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 36.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=36.9 · 2018=15.5 · 2019=16.9 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=11.5 · 2023=13.5 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Mcleansville, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.8 · 228% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #463/510
  • PHOTO Snyder Village
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 105 inj
  • SIZE ~142 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Snyder Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Ashton Health and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ashton Health and Rehabilitation averages 14.8 TCR (228% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ashton Health and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2017=36.9 · 2018=15.5 · 2019=16.9 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=11.5 · 2023=13.5 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Ashton Health and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #463 safest of 510 Nursing homes employers in North Carolina.

Ashton Health and Rehabilitation (142 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ashton Health and Rehabilitation
Ashton Health and Rehabilitation (142 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Ashton Health and Rehabilitation has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 3.5 6 0 0
2023 13.5 4.2 13 0 0
2022 11.5 5.8 10 0 0
2021 10.3 3.1 10 0 0
2020 8.6 3.4 10 0 0
2019 16.9 5.9 20 0 0
2018 15.5 9.5 16 2 0
2017 36.9 9.2 20 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Mcleansville

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 6 employers in Mcleansville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Snyder Village 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Athens Health and Rehabilitation, LLC 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crowne Health Care of Mobile 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Montgomery Health and Rehab, LLC 14.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shelco, LLC 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delta Contracting Inc. 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burford Construction North Carolina Statewide Operations 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Parton Lumber Company 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greensboro Distribution 778 FTE
CITY-NEAR Replacements, Ltd. 395 FTE
CITY-NEAR HNCML01 333 FTE
CITY-NEAR 240 GREENSBORO NC 56 FTE
NAT-TCR Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Design-Build, LLC. 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Smith Cares 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Clegg's Nursery LLC #4 14.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Masterson's Food and Drink, Inc. 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE CIMCO Refrigeration Inc. 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palm Garden of Sun City Center, LLC 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Mary Washington University Cen 142 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.