Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Indiana

Camp Red Cedar

Fort Wayne, IN · ~47 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Camp Red Cedar runs at 421% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Camp Red Cedar: 16.0 TCR = 421% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Camp Red Cedar safety composite

Camp Red Cedar scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Camp Red Cedar: 6.8 → 18.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 32.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2022

Camp Red Cedar's TCR rose 11.7 from 6.8 in 2016 to 18.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 32.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Fort Wayne, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.0 · 421% of ind

  • DART 18.6 DART
  • RANK #43/45
  • PHOTO Humboldt Senior Reso…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Humboldt Senior Resource Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Camp Red Cedar in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Camp Red Cedar averages 16.0 TCR (421% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Camp Red Cedar TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=22.7 · 2018=10.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=32.4 · 2021=20.7 · 2022=18.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Camp Red Cedar falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 45 Activity centers for disabled employers in Indiana.

Camp Red Cedar (47 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Camp Red Cedar
Camp Red Cedar (47 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Camp Red Cedar has fewer employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 18.6 18.6 2 0 0
2021 20.7 20.7 2 0 0
2020 32.4 32.4 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 10.8 10.8 1 0 0
2017 22.7 0.0 2 0 0
2016 6.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · IN · Fort Wayne

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 634 employers in Fort Wayne, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Humboldt Senior Resource Center 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Therapy Center 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jamaica 1 Day Hab Offices 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CWI-Transit 15.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE AquaBounty Farms Indiana LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Remington Plant 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Francesville 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boone REMC 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Memorial Hospital 6,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview North Hospital 4,648 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Corporate Office 3,312 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shambaugh & Son LP 3,072 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 2429 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pro Pallet LLC 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Encinitas Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01094 16.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Judson Manor 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Habersham Plantation 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZRDG 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Watermark at St. Peters 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.