Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · New York

CWI-Transit

Queensbury, NY · ~29 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CWI-Transit runs at 417% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade F.

CWI-Transit: 15.9 TCR = 417% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CWI-Transit safety composite

CWI-Transit scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.3

2016→2022

CWI-Transit injury rate improved

CWI-Transit's TCR fell 12.3 from 20.7 in 2016 to 8.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 20.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=20.7 · 2017=18.5 · 2021=15.9 · 2022=8.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Queensbury, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.9 · 417% of ind

  • DART 8.4 DART
  • RANK #146/158
  • PHOTO Brandman Center for …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brandman Center for Senior Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

CWI-Transit in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CWI-Transit averages 15.9 TCR (417% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CWI-Transit TCR series: 2016=20.7 · 2017=18.5 · 2021=15.9 · 2022=8.4 · BLS 3.8

Where CWI-Transit falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #146 safest of 158 Activity centers for disabled employers in New York.

CWI-Transit (29 employees, TCR 15.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CWI-Transit
CWI-Transit (29 employees, TCR 15.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

CWI-Transit has fewer employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.4 8.4 0 1 0
2021 15.9 15.9 2 0 0
2017 18.5 18.5 6 0 0
2016 20.7 20.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · NY · Queensbury

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 62 employers in Queensbury, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brandman Center for Senior Care 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norwood Day Hab 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camp Red Cedar 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Humboldt Senior Resource Center 16.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walnut Ridge Dairy LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE RG&E Canandaigua 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYSEG Norwich 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR CR Bard / BD 711 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD 644 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Work and Independence 524 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2116 369 FTE
NAT-TCR GSL Hospital 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Havertys Furniture 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 172654-Evn-Diamond Valley Sta 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Village Care 15.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE UGI Central Penn Gas Wellsboro 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indianapolis Corporate Store 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG806 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG419 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.