Placing and tying reinforcing rod at a construction site · Tennessee

Campbell Construction, Inc.

Manchester, TN · ~59 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Campbell Construction, Inc. runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Placing and tying reinforcing rod at a construction site workplace, earning a grade A.

Campbell Construction, Inc.: 0.7 TCR = 26% of Placing and tying reinforcing rod at a construction site BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Campbell Construction, Inc. safety composite

Campbell Construction, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Campbell Construction, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Campbell Construction, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=2.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Manchester, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/13
  • PHOTO Assemblers Precast &…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Assemblers Precast & Steel Services Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Campbell Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Campbell Construction, Inc. averages 0.7 TCR (26% of the Placing and tying reinforcing rod at a construction site BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Campbell Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=2.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Campbell Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

705 Placing and tying reinforcing establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 13 Placing and tying reinforcing employers in Tennessee.

Campbell Construction, Inc. (59 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Campbell Construction, Inc.
Campbell Construction, Inc. (59 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Campbell Construction, Inc. has more employees than the Placing and tying reinforcing rod at a c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · TN · Manchester

705 Placing and tying reinforcing rod at a construction site employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 43 employers in Manchester, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Assemblers Precast & Steel Services Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri-City Ironworks Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metrolina Steel Erectors, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harris Steel Erectors,inc 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Erwin Utilities Authority 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Landmark Construction 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rogers Group Inc. EMTN Construction 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE GS Steel LLC 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manchester / Smyrna 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Viam Manufacturing, Inc. 523 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Cheese Company, Inc. - Manchester 475 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Cheese of Tennessee, Inc. 361 FTE
NAT-TCR Diversified Builder Supply, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Princeton Medical Lodge 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dal-Italia LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR E & B PAVING LLC - Corporate 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Willer Tool Corporation 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE LOMA 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Young's Welding, Inc. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Promed Medical Complex 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.