Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Arizona

Promed Medical Complex

Yuma, AZ · ~59 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Promed Medical Complex runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade B.

Promed Medical Complex: 2.0 TCR = 52% of Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Promed Medical Complex safety composite

Promed Medical Complex scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Promed Medical Complex held a steady TCR band

Promed Medical Complex's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Yuma, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/30
  • PHOTO Orthopaedic Associat…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orthopaedic Associates of Reading, Ltd. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Promed Medical Complex in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Promed Medical Complex averages 2.0 TCR (52% of the Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Promed Medical Complex TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Promed Medical Complex falls in its industry

2,836 Medical doctors' (MDs, except establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 30 Medical doctors' (MDs, except employers in Arizona.

Promed Medical Complex (59 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Promed Medical Complex
Promed Medical Complex (59 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Promed Medical Complex has fewer employees than the Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental hea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.8 3.8 0 2 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · AZ · Yuma

2,836 Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 274 employers in Yuma, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orthopaedic Associates of Reading, Ltd. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 376 E Main St 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MN Gastro Woodbury 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-30338) 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Velocity Builders 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE BFL Construction Inc 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ellison-Mills Contracting LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apache Pipelines 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primetime Harvesting Inc 2,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing- Arizona 2,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuma Regional Medical Center 1,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR PGM PACKING INC 1,423 FTE
NAT-TCR Berry Global 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR West Virginia's Choice, Inc. - Beaver 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Idaho Opal & Gem Corporation 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CCC Salisbury 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Paradise Tomato Kitchens, Inc. - Los Banos 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Young's Welding, Inc. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Campbell Construction, Inc. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willer Tool Corporation 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.