Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Texas

Can-Fer Utility Services, LLC

Grand Prairie, TX · ~494 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Can-Fer Utility Services, LLC runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Can-Fer Utility Services, LLC: 0.8 TCR = 29% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Can-Fer Utility Services, LLC safety composite

Can-Fer Utility Services, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2019

Can-Fer Utility Services, LLC injury rate improved

Can-Fer Utility Services, LLC's TCR fell 0.7 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2019=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Grand Prairie, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #47/161
  • PHOTO Hydaker-Wheatlake - …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~494 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hydaker-Wheatlake - Indiana Statewide (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Can-Fer Utility Services, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Can-Fer Utility Services, LLC averages 0.8 TCR (29% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Can-Fer Utility Services, LLC TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2019=0.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Can-Fer Utility Services, LLC falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 161 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Texas.

Can-Fer Utility Services, LLC (494 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Can-Fer Utility Services, LLC
Can-Fer Utility Services, LLC (494 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Can-Fer Utility Services, LLC has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.5 0.5 3 0 0
2016 1.2 1.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · TX · Grand Prairie

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 405 employers in Grand Prairie, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hydaker-Wheatlake - Indiana Statewide 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Contracting Texas Statewide Operations 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSE&G NJ Projects & Construction 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Driftwood, TX 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Force Pressure Control, LLC 494 FTE
STATE-SIZE BDG Trees, LLC 494 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Post Oak Hotel at Uptown Park 494 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pinnergy - Entire Company 493 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Grand Prairie Campus (1435) 3,544 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poly-America, L.P. 2,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poly America 2,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inmar - 4355 Grand Prairie, TX 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR 95 Factory Road 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Distribution Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Owyhee Health and Rehabilitation 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR L.L.Frank Work Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vonore Glass Plant 494 FTE
NAT-SIZE Choate Construction Company 494 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metso Flow Control USA ,Inc 494 FTE
NAT-SIZE WCI 494 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.