Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · New Jersey

Cant Wait Logistics

Morristown, NJ · ~53 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cant Wait Logistics runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade A.

Cant Wait Logistics: 2.5 TCR = 38% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cant Wait Logistics safety composite

Cant Wait Logistics scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−50.9

2022→2024

Cant Wait Logistics injury rate improved

Cant Wait Logistics's TCR fell 50.9 from 53.4 in 2022 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 53.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=53.4 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Morristown, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.5 · 38% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #21/211
  • PHOTO Judge Delivery Partn…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Judge Delivery Partners LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Cant Wait Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cant Wait Logistics averages 2.5 TCR (38% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cant Wait Logistics TCR series: 2022=53.4 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Cant Wait Logistics falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 211 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in New Jersey.

Cant Wait Logistics (53 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Cant Wait Logistics
Cant Wait Logistics (53 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Cant Wait Logistics has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 53.4 26.7 12 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NJ · Morristown

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 51 employers in Morristown, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Judge Delivery Partners LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PNS 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parcels Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR FRANKLIN (PAFRA) 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4039-03601100-00W001 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. Servidone Jr. Equipment & Sales 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.D'Annunzio & Sons Inc. 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin Township Public Works 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morristown Medical Center 6,434 FTE
CITY-NEAR Artech, LLC 5,320 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Home Care and Hospice 601 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schindler US HQ 542 FTE
NAT-TCR Suffolk MZB-USA 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Molex Kingbird 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Don Kennedy Roofing 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Palmetto Landing 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Estates at Fridley 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dominion Anderson, LLC 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Handi-Shop 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.