Distribution of electric power · Florida

Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Chiefland, FL · ~102 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc. runs at 206% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc.: 2.5 TCR = 206% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc. safety composite

Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2017→2024

Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc. injury rate improved

Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.9 from 4.4 in 2017 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.4 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Chiefland, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.5 · 206% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #102/135
  • PHOTO Grayson Collin Elect…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grayson Collin Electric Cooperative (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc. averages 2.5 TCR (206% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc. TCR series: 2017=4.4 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc. falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #102 safest of 135 Distribution of electric power employers in Florida.

Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc. (102 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc. (102 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc. has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 3 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 2.1 1.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.3 5.3 6 0 0
2017 4.4 3.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · FL · Chiefland

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 10 employers in Chiefland, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grayson Collin Electric Cooperative 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salina Service Center 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dallas County Service Center 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR WBASC Wilkes-Barre Service Center 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Immokalee Packing 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Southeast Florida (Coconut Creek) 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Structural Building Components LP 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE T B Landmark Construction Inc. 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1297 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1297 342 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1808-00001201-168 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7102113 DUKE Hardeetown 59 FTE
NAT-TCR King Solutions,Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Don Kennedy Roofing 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Related Management Company LP Marshall Field Garden Apt 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 63-Usf-Olf Newport News 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Celina Manor 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt (Georgia Box), Inc. 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yosemite Gateway Inn 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.