Marine cargo handling services · Maryland

Canton Port Services and Project Stevedoring

Baltimore, MD · ~51 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Canton Port Services and Project Stevedoring runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Marine cargo handling services workplace, earning a grade D.

Canton Port Services and Project Stevedoring: 5.6 TCR = 124% of Marine cargo handling services BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Canton Port Services and Project Stevedoring safety composite

Canton Port Services and Project Stevedoring scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2020→2024

Canton Port Services and Project Stevedoring injury rate improved

Canton Port Services and Project Stevedoring's TCR fell 3.6 from 7.6 in 2020 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=7.6 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=11.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488320 · Baltimore, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 124% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #7/17
  • PHOTO CPA - Barbours Cut V…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CPA - Barbours Cut Vessel Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Canton Port Services and Project Stevedoring in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Canton Port Services and Project Stevedoring averages 5.6 TCR (124% of the Marine cargo handling services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Canton Port Services and Project Stevedoring TCR series: 2020=7.6 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=11.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=4 · BLS 4.5

Where Canton Port Services and Project Stevedoring falls in its industry

391 Marine cargo handling services establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 17 Marine cargo handling services employers in Maryland.

Canton Port Services and Project Stevedoring (51 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Canton Port Services and Project Stevedoring
Canton Port Services and Project Stevedoring (51 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Canton Port Services and Project Stevedoring has fewer employees than the Marine cargo handling services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 11.5 1.6 7 0 0
2021 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2020 7.6 7.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488320 · MD · Baltimore

391 Marine cargo handling services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CPA - Barbours Cut Vessel Operations 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suderman Contract Stevedores, Inc. - Galveston 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portus Stevedoring LLC 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ceres Miami 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE White Marsh Training Center 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barkay, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inland Pipe Rehabilitation Northeast, LLC 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monumental Paving & Excavating, Inc. 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1158 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bill Doran LLC - Simply Ready 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR S03948 - WI Metro LF 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Gaffney - 813 Hamrick Street 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Madison MOB 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chudy Paper Company 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park West 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rusnak Audi Westlake 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.