Custom builders (except for-sale), single-family home · Massachusetts

Cape Associates Eastham office

Eastham, MA · ~123 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cape Associates Eastham office runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Custom builders (except for-sale), single-family home workplace, earning a grade D.

Cape Associates Eastham office: 7.3 TCR = 192% of Custom builders (except for-sale), single-family home BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cape Associates Eastham office safety composite

Cape Associates Eastham office scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2016→2022

Cape Associates Eastham office injury rate improved

Cape Associates Eastham office's TCR fell 4.1 from 7.6 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.6 · 2017=10.7 · 2018=8.1 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Eastham, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 192% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #16/19
  • PHOTO Windows Plus Constru…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~123 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Windows Plus Construction Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Cape Associates Eastham office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cape Associates Eastham office averages 7.3 TCR (192% of the Custom builders (except for-sale), single-family home BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cape Associates Eastham office TCR series: 2016=7.6 · 2017=10.7 · 2018=8.1 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=3.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Cape Associates Eastham office falls in its industry

976 Custom builders (except for-sa establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 19 Custom builders (except for-sa employers in Massachusetts.

Cape Associates Eastham office (123 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cape Associates Eastham office
Cape Associates Eastham office (123 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Cape Associates Eastham office has more employees than the Custom builders (except for-sale), singl median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.5 0.9 4 0 0
2021 7.2 7.2 8 0 0
2020 6.7 5.8 8 0 0
2018 8.1 7.2 9 0 0
2017 10.7 10.7 12 0 0
2016 7.6 6.7 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · MA · Eastham

976 Custom builders (except for-sale), single-family home employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 3 employers in Eastham, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Windows Plus Construction Inc 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Konwinski Construction Inc 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Douston Construction 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nourse Farms, Inc. 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE DPR Construction - Boston 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thyssenkrupp- Boston 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marr Scaffolding Company 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cape Associates, Inc. 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ponderosa Landscaping 38 FTE
NAT-TCR Certified, Inc. 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Hills Store 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Gavilon Grain - Red Rock (St Paul, MN) 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Atkins 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brinco Manufacturing Inc. 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunoco Transportation SES 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Proos Manufacturing 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tropical Shell & Gift 123 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.