Duplex (i.e., side-by-side) construction general contractors · Michigan

Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation

Grand Rapids, MI · ~200 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Duplex (i.e., side-by-side) construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation: 7.3 TCR = 192% of Duplex (i.e., side-by-side) construction general contractors BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation safety composite

Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation: 5.9 → 8.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 8.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.42× in 2017

Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation's TCR rose 2.9 from 5.9 in 2016 to 8.7 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 192% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #18/22
  • PHOTO Windows Plus Constru…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Windows Plus Construction Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation averages 7.3 TCR (192% of the Duplex (i.e., side-by-side) construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2017=8.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation falls in its industry

976 Duplex (i.e., side-by-side) co establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 22 Duplex (i.e., side-by-side) co employers in Michigan.

Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation (200 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation
Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation (200 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation has more employees than the Duplex (i.e., side-by-side) construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 8.7 3.1 17 0 0
2016 5.9 3.2 10 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · MI · Grand Rapids

976 Duplex (i.e., side-by-side) construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Windows Plus Construction Inc 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Konwinski Construction Inc 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cape Associates Eastham office 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Douston Construction 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mid-American Group 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mall City Mechanical 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flexco Grand Rapids-Walker 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE AAM-Oxford Manufacturing Facility 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR 0198 - North Austin, Tx 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Salude - The Art of Rceovery 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Watertown (Sdwat) 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Palmyra (Mopal) 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Interstate Drywall Corp. 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Muncie Power Products, Inc. Mfg Div 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE PepsiCo DC 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owens-Illinois Glass Portland N21 200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.