Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Cape Cod Senior Residences

Pocasset, MA · ~49 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cape Cod Senior Residences runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Cape Cod Senior Residences: 3.9 TCR = 101% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cape Cod Senior Residences safety composite

Cape Cod Senior Residences scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cape Cod Senior Residences: 0.0 → 57.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 57.7 TCR · DART/TCR 14.99× in 2024

Cape Cod Senior Residences's TCR rose 57.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 57.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 14.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Pocasset, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 101% of ind

  • DART 57.7 DART
  • RANK #43/210
  • PHOTO The Residence at Whi…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Residence at Whitehall (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Cape Cod Senior Residences in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cape Cod Senior Residences averages 3.9 TCR (101% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cape Cod Senior Residences TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=12.1 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=57.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Cape Cod Senior Residences falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Cape Cod Senior Residences (49 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cape Cod Senior Residences
Cape Cod Senior Residences (49 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cape Cod Senior Residences has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 57.7 57.7 0 15 0
2023 8.7 8.7 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.8 2.9 1 1 0
2019 12.1 8.1 3 0 0
2018 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Pocasset

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 5 employers in Pocasset, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Residence at Whitehall 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardens of Nashville 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Williamston House 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Colonnade at Northdale 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE G&F Precision Molding INC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE TANGO CONSTRCTION, INC. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nashoba Air Inc. 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR POCASSET 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR 42121G - POCASSET 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR TMX2049 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR TMX2049 - SOUTHEASTERN NEW ENGLAND 25 FTE
NAT-TCR Hendrick Cedar Mall 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Keefe Ohio 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Poteau Plus 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Watermark at 3030 Park 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pineville 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anthony Mechanical Services, Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stark Truss Co., Inc. Rensselaer, IN 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boise - BMD 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.